Sunday, April 14, 2013



FINAL BLOG FOR ONTL 7201 – PRODUCING DIGITAL CONTENT

The certificate program has been a great learning experience for me.  The four courses designed for the online certificate program connected effectively and resulted in a comprehensive and rigorous learning experience.  As a result of this experience, I have no doubt that I will be an effective online instructor.

As I reflect on my learning experience in the Producing Digital Content course, one of the key steps during my journey was to become knowledgeable and skilled in the use of the Blackboard course management system.  I was unaware of the multi-dimensional Blackboard System.  Now following the course in this program and after taking and completing a number of tutorials, I feel very proficient using, explaining and trouble-shooting the Blackboard System.

Producing Digital Content was the most challenging course of the four in the program.  The course required a significant amount of time and effort.  We were instructed through a “trial and error” processing for building the shell of a new course.  During the early stages of the Producing Digital Content course it was apparent, a lack of knowing the “short cuts” to effective course development were lacking for me.  Although this course was challenging and at times frustrating it has been rewarding as the result of my hard work, which resulted in a functional online course.

Dr. Joy Bensiger, the instructor was very knowledgeable, accessible and tireless in his attempts to provide a collaborative group and “one-on-one” assistance throughout the course.  His accessibility and guidance was critical to my success with the course.

Sometime in the future, "Analyzing Exemplary Teaching Strategies for Elementary and Secondary Teacher”, may be offered at Governors State University.  I hope to be the instructor for this course.  The certificate program and the Producing Digital Content course has given me the necessary foundation to build a functional course from the "ground up".  If I have an opportunity to teach the Analyzing Exemplary Teaching Strategies course, I will develop the remaining eight lessons for the course.

According to the research, the Quality Matters rubric sets the standard for the online teaching and learning field.  We reviewed and used the Quality Matters rubric to measure how effective our course was developing.  The general standards include the following items:
 #1 The overall design of the course is made clear to the student at the beginning of the course. The course introduction sets the tone for the course, lets students know what to expect, and provides guidance to ensure they get off to a good start.  Instructions make clear how to get started and where to find various course components.

#2) Learning objectives are measurable and are clearly stated.  The learning objectives establish a foundation upon which the rest of the course is based. Assessment strategies are designed to evaluate student progress by reference to stated learning objectives; to measure the effectiveness of student learning; and to be integral to the learning process.

#3 Instructional materials are sufficiently comprehensive to achieve stated course objectives and learning outcomes. The instructional materials form the core of the course, and these standards respect the instructor’s prerogative in selecting them. The focus of this standard is on supporting the course objectives and competencies, rather than on qualitative judgments about the materials.
#4 The instructional materials contribute to the achievement of the stated course and module/unit learning objectives.
#5 Forms of interaction are incorporated in the course to motivate students and promote learning. Engaging students to become active learners contributing to the learning process and to student persistence.
#6 Course navigation and technology support student engagement and ensure access to course components. The technology enabling the various course components facilitates the student’s learning experience and is easy to use, rather than impeding the student’s progress.
#7 The course facilitates student access to institutional support services essential to student success.  In the learner support standard, four different kinds of support services are addressed: technical support, accessibility support, academic services support, and student services support.
#8 The course demonstrates a commitment to accessibility for all students. The accessibility standard incorporates the principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and is consistent with Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG).
In summary, this course and the Online Teaching and Learning Certificate program not only provided me information to be an effective online instructor and has improved my effectiveness teaching in the face to face environment.  I plan to continue to increase my knowledge of online teaching and I look forward to teaching online.  I extend my sincere appreciation for Janet Engle, Barbara Mandel and Nikki Rosebourgh who were instructors in the online teaching and learning program.  They have been outstanding role models and examples of exemplary teachers.  I would also like to thank my fellow peers who were very helpful along my journey.

Saturday, August 25, 2012

Producing Digital Content - ONTL 7210 (8/26/2012)

  


Expectations and Aspirations for ONTL 653 - Producing Digital Content (1/25/2013)



My Initial Expectations (January 2013):

As a future online instructor, I want to be able to write curriculum using the templates that we have learned to use and to be able to employ the technology associate with online learning.  The technology associated with the online learning environment will present additional challenges not part of any traditional learning experience that I have had in my career.  Some of the online learning challenges we will be focusing on in this course include creating a course structure in a learning management system.  The area which cause me some concern includes creating a standard learning module and the establishment student-student interactions.  Although we have discussed the technique that is used to establish student-student interactions and student-teacher interactions, I want to work to make my interactions as effective as possible.
The development of an interactive syllabus orientation using the learning tool module appears to be a very interesting project.  I understand that we will continue to develop the technical skills needed by an online instructor.  I am glad that we will have an opportunity for collaboration with students in our course.  I believe that is it critical to creating and maintain an engaging learning environment of the online learning community.  I think many of the friendships that we have made in this course will continue after the semester concludes in four months.

My aspirations (January 2013):

Recently, I retired after thirty-three years as a secondary teacher and high school administrator in Illinois.    Although I had retired, I wanted to continue working.  When I enrolled in the online teaching program, I learned about the many opportunities that it offered.  The online teaching environment offers participants the freedom to teach and learn any place that has an internet connection.
I began the job application process by sending out my resume/e-portfolio and connecting to a few individuals on Linked-in.  This tool is very effective because participants can exchange information and ideas about their procession.  Unfortunately, I have not been able to secure a new job.



Final Reflections for Designing Online Courses – ONTL 7101 (11/24/2012)

      This blog entry is a summary of my experiences and what I have learned during the third online course of the certificate program sequence.  Designing Online Courses, which is the third course of the Online Certificate Program, was more intense than the first two courses.  During the first two courses we reviewed the research about online learning.  In the Designing Online Courses we were asked to integrate what we had learned in the first two courses into a course design project.  In addition to some new content, the design course was an application, analysis and synthesis of the online learning research. 
     The focus of Designing Online Courses was to develop a course proposal that would be built in the fourth course of the Online Certificate Program.  The course proposal was submitted through an academic paper.  In addition to the course proposal three lesson modules were developed which included objectives, content readings, online discussions and formative and summative assessments.  My course proposal included a draft of the course description for Analyzing Exemplary Teaching Practices for Elementary and Secondary Teachers.  As an assessment, the academic paper course proposal and lesson worksheets were designed to show what I had learned from our application of the online course design research.  Components of the academic paper and worksheets which summarized the lessons were submitted to my peers for review and suggested changes.  The development and submission of the academic paper caused me to think about the course proposal and to create a more refined product.  This process is an example of a formative assessment.  After completing all of the components and reviewing suggested changes, we were instructed to submit the paper as a complete project which is an example of a summative assessment.   
     The Quality Matters Rubric was used to create the structure for the academic paper that each student was required to submit.  Quality Matters was developed by Maryland Online, Inc.  It is a set of eight standards for the design of online and blended courses.  What makes the rubric powerful is that it should be used in a peer review process for examining and improving online and hybrid courses.  The academic paper and lesson worksheets were submitted for peer review using the Quality Matters Rubric.  The standards of the Quality Matters Rubric included; course overview and introduction, learning objectives, assessment and measurement, instructional materials, learner interaction and engagement, course technology, learner support and accessibility.  The instructional methodology used in our class focused on the four “C’s” (collaboration, collegiality, continuous and centered on the research) used with the Quality Matters Rubric.
     What I learned from the content and interactions of the Designing Online Courses includes the elements of curriculum design within the considerations and constraints unique to online course design.  Curriculum design; included the review and re-write of the course description and course objectives.  Course objectives were written to reflect Bloom’s taxonomy level appropriate for graduate courses.  Where appropriate, course objectives were written to reflect the application, analysis and synthesis level of the taxonomy.  The objectives were also written to align with the various forms of assessment that I selected for the proposed course.
     We reviewed the research pertaining to learning styles and other student variables.  Course design reflected the need for multi-types of learning styles.  Another student variable considered during the research process focused on the learning of adult students.  Multiple aspects of the adult learner were considered when developing the initial lessons.  An ice breaker was included that students will complete to share information about their stage in life and their desire to become an educator.  Many adult learners have professional and personal responsibilities that must be considered.
     The research for designing community-building strategies to improve student retention and enhance learning outcomes was reviewed and infused into the course proposal.  The focus for building community strategies included development of self selected students for the proposed course and the exchange of information via the ice breaker exercise.  Students will be encouraged to work together in self selected teams of three to four to complete and review responses to discussion thread questions.
     The design of student-content, student-instructor and student-student interactions was researched and discussed in a discussion thread forums.  Interactions were expanded to include student review of the content from two textbooks and resources from the internet.  Student-student interactions included the discussion thread question responses and reviews.  The interactions also included the application of new knowledge and skill to the simulation.  A format for student-student and student-instructor interactions was also discussed in the academic paper.  A rationale for each type of interaction was presented and discussed.
     Formative and summative concepts were researched and discussed.  Through the use of a word table, course objectives and formative and summative assessments were connected.  The table was presented in a discussion thread for review by students and the instructor.  Revisions were made based on comments and suggestions of other students and the instructor.  A careful balance was established to include formative and summative assessments which were appropriate for each course objective.
     The culminating learning activity of the design course included the assignment of student reviewers to completed projects using the Quality Matters Rubric.  Each of the eight standards were addressed and used to evaluate the effectiveness of the course proposal of another student.  A determination was made as to the success of student efforts to address the eight standards.  Although students were using the rubric for the discussion of the paper proposal and lesson worksheets, it was evident that the standards were addressed by the discussion of the student in the draft that was submitted.  I believe this learning activity was one of the best experiences that I have had in the courses taken in higher education and believe that this is the best vehicle for instruction.  This instructional method is how all courses should be developed that connects with a variety of learning styles.



Initial Reflections about Designing Online Courses - ONTL 652 (8/26/2012)
Introduction and Reflections of my learning in ONTL 650 & 651
The first two courses completed for the certificate of online teaching and learning program explored the research that supports effective instructional strategies and characteristics of the adult student learner.  Learning experiences focused on reviewing and reflecting on the research.  The research included a review of "Implementing the Seven Principles: Technology as a Lever" (1996) by Arthur Chickering and Stephen Ehrmann.  Students reviewed the work of Suskie, Linda (2002) “Fair Assessment Practices: Giving Students Equitable Opportunities to Demonstrate Learning” from the May issue of AAHE Bulletin (American Association for Higher Education).  Our discussions were related to our readings and our interpretation of the research.  Students in the courses were exposed to effective online instructional technique through the development of an online learning community.  We completed two group projects for the courses.  During the ONTL 650 our group project consisted of a lesson which introduced information about the Civil Rights Movement in the United States from 1865 to 1974.  The group project developed for the ONTL 651 course consisted of a check list which would be useful to a new facilitator of online courses.
Observations About Effective Online Course Design Technique
The Quality Matters Rubric document provides an outline of the necessary elements or standards for effective online course design.  The Quality Matters (QM) program is a national recognized, faculty-centered peer review process designed to certify the quality of online courses and online components.  According to QM, colleges and universities across the country use the tools in developing, maintaining and reviewing online courses and in training faculty.  About 10 percent or 550 colleges and universities subscribe to the on-profit Quality Matters Program.  The eight elements standards include the Course Overview & Introduction, Learning Objectives (competencies), Assessment and Measurement, Instructional Materials, Learner Interaction & Engagement, Course Technology, Learner Support and Accessibility.  Each element is defined by listing critical points which must be present in an effectively designed online course.  The rubric is an effective tool which will be used as a guide in the development of my course and the three lessons which I plan to create.
It is evident when applying the Quality Matters Rubric to an evaluation of the ONTL 650 and 651 course content both contain all of the effective components.  The courses contained a course overview and instructions to the students that would enable an effective start.  The two instructors provided introductions and the necessary contact information.  Course objectives and specific lesson objectives were displayed and easy to understand.  Assessment materials and feedback strategies were explained and connected to the instructional materials which were listed and easy to access.  Learner interaction and engagement was promoted through the use of discussion threads and varied group projects.  Finally, learner support and accessibility were provided to ensure the success of all students.
Experience Creating Traditional Courses - How Building Online Courses is Different
Although my experience in developing curriculum for higher education courses is limited, I have worked with teacher teams at the secondary education level to develop technology courses.  The teacher teams also developed interdisciplinary consumer economics courses for traditional classroom delivery at the high school.  The curriculum was developed to reflect national and State of Illinois standards for learning as defined by the national council for economics and the Illinois State Board of Education standards and benchmarks.  After completing the development of the curriculum, a teacher team reviewed and selected a textbook for the course.  Formative and summative assessments and student feedback were developed and revised by the teacher teams.  During the summer of 2012, the teacher teams will begin exploring the delivery of the secondary economics course using an online format.  This process will take about two years for development
As the teacher teams begin to work on the online delivery of the secondary consumer economics course, they will need to consider the maturity of the high school student.  Traditionally, secondary students have not been successful in the online learning environment due to a lack of maturity and the inability to be self motivated.  It seems that only a small percentage of students are ready for the higher education learning environment.   While the textbook is available online, the curriculum will need to be re-written so that students can engage the content, instructor and other students.  Synchronous lessons must be developed and posted to the district network.  Asynchronous sessions will include the use of discussion threads with a clearly defined procedure for the students.  Finally, student assessments will need to be modified and posted so that the assessments can be scored online.
Personal Expectations for Designing Online Courses
I am excited about reviewing the research which supports effective design of online courses.  Also, I looking forward to learning how to apply effective online course design to the development of a course to teach effective instructional strategies to elementary and secondary educational professionals.  My plans include the completion of the four courses and earning the Certificate of Online Learning Program.  After completing the program I plan to teach online and traditional courses for Governors State University.  I have thirty-three years as a professional educator and would like to contribute to my profession.
Specific Expectations for Designing Online Courses
At the conclusion of the ONTL 652, course I will be able to:
·         Identify curriculum design considerations and constraints unique to the online environment
·         Address learning styles and other student variables when designing online courses
·         Design community-based strategies to improve student retention and enhance learning outcomes
·         Select strategies for content delivery to support learning objectives
·         Design student-content, student-faculty and student-student interactions and collaborative experiences for online courses
·         Select appropriate strategies for assessing student learning in online courses
·         Use reflective learning strategies to integrate learning into personal knowledge bases
·         Apply best practices standards to the design and evaluation of online courses
At the conclusion of this course, each student is expected to present a course outline which will include three units of instruction to be delivered in an online learning format.  Each student is expected to present a scholarly paper to support the curriculum, lessons and instruction strategies and technique to be delivered in a future course.

Monday, July 23, 2012

Facilitating Online Learning-End of Part III: Reflections of Lesson 8-10 July 29 2012



Facilitating Online Learning – End of Part III:  Reflections of Lessons 8-10 (July 29, 2012)

 
Part III:  Review of Lessons 8-10


Comparing the Facilitation of an Online Course and the Conventional Classroom Course:

The Facilitation of an online course is similar in many respects to that of a conventional classroom course.  The elements needed for the online and conventional course include a syllabus and brief orientation, a textbook or series of readings to reinforce or introduce knowledge to the student and an assessment strategy.  A reviewed of the purpose of assessments and several types of assessments the focus of lesson eight.  An assessment strategy should contain both formative and summative assessments. 

Formative assessments include tests given periodically to measure knowledge and skills acquired through a lesson or chapter and the use of the results to adjust the teaching strategy.  The formative assessment is used to measure learning at of students at a particular time relative to the course objectives or content standards.  Measuring the growth and development of skills and knowledge and adjusting strategies as needed is termed the “Growth Model”.

The second type of assessment is the summative assessment in which a test or performance activity is given at the end of a certain period of time such as the end of a unit or semester.  Often a criterion reference test which measures the knowledge and skill development as defined by the course objectives is administered to students.  Specific questions are developed and referenced to a specific course objective.  An achievement test or standardized test can be purchased because it is developed based on a set of “normed” questions which have been given to like students across the United States.

Regardless of which category of assessment is used, the key is the development of an equitable assessment system.  An equitable assessment system implies that students are assessed using methods and procedures most appropriate to them based on their preference or learning style.  The assessments given should vary depending on the student’s prior knowledge, cultural experience and cognitive style.  While a custom assessment system for each student is not practical, there are steps that an instructor can use to make assessments as fair as possible for students.  There are seven steps to fair assessment as outlined by Suskie (2002) in Adventures in Assessment (American Association for Higher Education):

1.       Have clearly stated learning outcomes which include sharing with students a list of concepts and skills on the assessment with the rubric if applicable

2.       Match the assessment to what was taught

3.       Use multiple measures and different types of measures to avoid the “high-stakes” assessments such as a standardized multiple choice test as the sole or primary factor for a significant decision such as passing a course or graduating or becoming certified

4.       Help students learn how to do assessment tasks by distributing examples of exemplary work

5.       Engage and encourage students with expressions of confidence in their ability

6.       Interpret assessment results appropriately by comparing students against their peers, based on a standard or evidence that the student has acquired knowledge and/or skill

7.       Evaluate the outcomes of the assessment by asking how well the instructor performed for future revisions


Diversity Issues of Online Facilitation:

Facilitating online learning also includes understanding diversity issues and how they impact course facilitation.  Online instruction has diminished the once barriers of geography.  Students from around the world can enroll and participate in a course populated by individuals from a variety of ethnic backgrounds.  While participants of a heterogeneous course benefit from the experience and exchanges of the online learning community there is potential for misunderstandings.  Specifically the instructional approach of one culture may not be as effective in another culture.  Language can be another barrier to effective instruction.  While English may be the primary language of the instructor, it may not be of the learners in the course.  A third barrier is that of time difference.  While this is not an issue of asynchronous assignments, it could be for synchronous presentations or meetings.  Flexibility by offering multiple sessions or altering presentations can encourage participation by all students in a course.

I found Henderson’s multiple cultures model (1996, 2007) to be an effective tool for the inclusion of cultures and learning approaches.  Henderson suggests the multiple cultural model based on the consistent interaction of three specific cultural influences that are integrated into the course design, academic culture, the dominate culture and minority culture or cultures.  Henderson’s eclectic approach offers more than a single socio-constructivist approach, making it possible to integrate the three cultural influences into the instructional design of the course.  Henderson’s multiple cultures model integrates the minority cultures’ point of view into each of the educational dimensions involved in the design of the teaching and learning environment.  Abandonment of more traditional practices encourages the combination of concrete elements that tend toward a gradual adoption of the constructivist paradigm.

Case Studies of Online Course Facilitation:

The final lesson of the course gave us (students) an opportunity to practice decision making within various case-studies.  We had an opportunity to apply what we had learned to a variety of what I would call “everyday situations” of an online learning environment.  A series of brief scenarios of common facilitation issues were presented for our review and comment in discussion threads.  Our scenarios included non participation in a course by various students, a discussion topic which caused a group of students to disregard internet rules of communication and engagement, another group of students who are unable to work together and resolve timing issues, a student who claims to be in the wrong course after non-participation for five weeks, and the possibility of student submittal of plagiarized work.

The student discussion was some of the most engaging of the semester.  Some students provided responses based on their experience as a student and instructor.  Students used what we had learned from our readings and interactions to formulate responses for each of the scenarios.  I think each of us had an opportunity to formulate a response to the scenario and then to be able to view the responses provided by others in the class.    

Faciliation Experience ONTL 651 July 2012


My Reflections regarding the facilitation of Lessons 8 and 9 (July 29, 2012)


How I prepared for my facilitation of Lesson 8 & 9:

First, I reviewed the lecture and readings which were developed and posted by the instructor of ONTL 651.  As I reviewed the materials, I considered what elements were needed to be developed for a lesson presentation which should be interesting and engaging.  One element which I thought needed to be developed was an ice breaker activity.  The readings from the previous lesson included the development and delivery of the ice breaker.  As I continued to review the assigned readings, I began developing an ice breaker that I thought would engage all the students.  I also thought that the ice breaker should be developed to make connections from what was learned in the prior lesson.  The ice breaker idea began to take the shape of a review of the prior lesson. 

The next step was to contact my co-presenter, Kim Sharp.  Kim and I held several meetings using Blackboard IM (instant messenger).  During our first online meeting we discussed the use of the ice breaker idea and decided to use the KWL format.  We also discussed the need to develop a Wiki for the work on Lesson 8 & 9 and the Group 2 Project.  I suggested to Kim that we might consider developing a power point presentation, starting with a story board.  A story board is a bulleted list of concepts that would be developed into slides.  Additional meetings were held to develop and revise the power point for lesson 8 and 9.


My facilitation of asynchronous and synchronous learning and the techniques used:

The asynchronous experience was different in my role as the instructor.  First, I wanted to complete my responses to the discussion questions early in the week so that I could focus on those of other students throughout the week in my instructor role.  Early in the week, the process was slow as I was responding to each student discussion and making individual comments.  As the week evolved it was apparent that there was a common theme or answer that students were using.  I decided that I could copy and paste a response.  When I facilitated the second lesson, I immediately responded to discussions using the copy/paste response.

My initial expectation and fears:

At the beginning of the week for lesson 8, I feared the unknown.  Although I had participated and observed the presentations of other students, I felt uncomfortable about what was needed to be a good facilitator.  I believe working with another student on the facilitation of lessons 8 and 9 gave me the confidence to be successful.  If I use this type of assignment in my online course, I will suggest to students that they work with another student in group projects and presentations.

What was successful:

I believe completing each lesson without encountering technological issues was successful.  My co-presenter and I had observed issues that other students had encountered and we were ready to move from an audio presentation to a fully text-based presentation.  Our idea to involved the students in a class discussion was successful as most participated in the ice breaker and the concluding activity.  Several individuals sent their student reviews to us which were very positive.

How the experience has changed my perception about facilitating online learning:

As I complete each assignment and each course, I continue to desire to teach courses online.  The curriculum and instruction is complete and provides opportunities to personally explore and practice online instruction and facilitation.

My Reflections regarding the facilitation of Lessons 8 and 9 (July 29, 2012)


My Reflections regarding the facilitation of Lessons 8 and 9 (July 29, 2012)


How I prepared for my facilitation of Lesson 8 & 9:

First, I reviewed the lecture and readings which were developed and posted by the instructor of ONTL 651.  As I reviewed the materials, I considered what elements were needed to be developed for a lesson presentation which should be interesting and engaging.  One element which I thought needed to be developed was an ice breaker activity.  The readings from the previous lesson included the development and delivery of the ice breaker.  As I continued to review the assigned readings, I began developing an ice breaker that I thought would engage all the students.  I also thought that the ice breaker should be developed to make connections from what was learned in the prior lesson.  The ice breaker idea began to take the shape of a review of the prior lesson. 

The next step was to contact my co-presenter, Kim Sharp.  Kim and I held several meetings using Blackboard IM (instant messenger).  During our first online meeting we discussed the use of the ice breaker idea and decided to use the KWL format.  We also discussed the need to develop a Wiki for the work on Lesson 8 & 9 and the Group 2 Project.  I suggested to Kim that we might consider developing a power point presentation, starting with a story board.  A story board is a bulleted list of concepts that would be developed into slides.  Additional meetings were held to develop and revise the power point for lesson 8 and 9.


My facilitation of asynchronous and synchronous learning and the techniques used:

The asynchronous experience was different in my role as the instructor.  First, I wanted to complete my responses to the discussion questions early in the week so that I could focus on those of other students throughout the week in my instructor role.  Early in the week, the process was slow as I was responding to each student discussion and making individual comments.  As the week evolved it was apparent that there was a common theme or answer that students were using.  I decided that I could copy and paste a response.  When I facilitated the second lesson, I immediately responded to discussions using the copy/paste response.


My initial expectation and fears:

At the beginning of the week for lesson 8, I feared the unknown.  Although I had participated and observed the presentations of other students, I felt uncomfortable about what was needed to be a good facilitator.  I believe working with another student on the facilitation of lessons 8 and 9 gave me the confidence to be successful.  If I use this type of assignment in my online course, I will suggest to students that they work with another student in group projects and presentations.


What was successful:

I believe completing each lesson without encountering technological issues was successful.  My co-presenter and I had observed issues that other students had encountered and we were ready to move from an audio presentation to a fully text-based presentation.  Our idea to involved the students in a class discussion was successful as most participated in the ice breaker and the concluding activity.  Several individuals sent their student reviews to us which were very positive.


How the experience has changed my perception about facilitating online learning:

As I complete each assignment and each course, I continue to desire to teach courses online.  The curriculum and instruction is complete and provides opportunities to personally explore and practice online instruction and facilitation.


Bibliography


Chapurs, Lea (2003), "Pedagogy", Education & Training - Module 1.0 Pedagogy (Retrieved on June 13, 2012 at http://bb9.govst.edu/bbcwebdav/pid315538-d...Lesson_04/Pedagogy-learning-technologies.pdf)

Gange', R. M. (1985) "The Conditions of Learning (4th Ed.), New York, NY., Holt, Rhinehart & Winston Publishing. (Retrieved on June 6, 2012 at http://www.editlib.org/d/4805/article_4805.pdf)

Chickering, Arthur and Ehrmann, Stephen (1996), "Implementing The Seven Principles: Technology As Lever".  AAHE Bulletin, October, p. 3-6. (Retrieved on May 23, 2012 at http://www.tltgroup.org/programs/seven.html)

Hewson, Lindsay and Hughes, Chris (2005), Social Processes and Pedagogy in Online Learning" and Biggs, J. (1996) "Enhancing Teaching Through Constructive Alignment: Higher Education, 32, p. 1-18, AACE Journal 13(2), p. 99-125. (Retrieved on June 20, 2012 at http://ww.editlib.org/d/4805/article_4805.pdf)

Hrastinski, Stefan; "Asynchronous Synchronous E-Learning:  A Study of Asynchronous and Synchronous E-learning Methods Discovered that Each Support Different Purposes".  Educause Quarterly, No. 4, 2008, p. 51-55. (Retrieved on May 23, 2012 at http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+QUARTERLY...Asynchronous_Synchronous Elea163445)

Principles of Effective Teaching and Learning - Queensland State Schools (Retrieved on June 13, 2012 at http://education.qld.gov.au/curriculum/learning/teaching/technology/principl.html)

Paulsen, M.F. (1995), "The Online Report on Pedagogy Techniques for Computer - Mediated Communications" (Retrieved on July 8, 2012 at http://www.netskolen.com/'forsk)

White, Nancy; "Online and Offline Facilitation:  Different Yet Alike?"  Full Circle Associates 4616 25th Avenue, HE PMB#126 - Seattle, WA 98105. (Retrieved on May 23, 2012 at http://www.fullcirc.com/community/onvsofflinefac.htm)

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Facilitating Online Teaching and Learning ONTL 651


Facilitating Online Learning Blog (ONTL 651)

My Initial Expectations (May 27, 2012):

The responsibilities of a traditional classroom teacher include administrative, pedagogical, facilitation and evaluation tasks.  An online instructor must complete all the tasks of a traditional instructor and be able to employ the technology associate with online learning.  The online learning environment presents additional challenges not part of the traditional learning experience.  Some of the online learning challenges include distance learning, communication issues and a variety of student issues with technology.  Three areas which cause me concern as a contemplate entering the online instruction field are creating an engaging learning experience and facilitation of learning.


The second course in the Online Teaching and Learning Certificate Program is Facilitating Online Learning.  The essential objectives or outcomes of the course address the knowledge and skills needed to effectively instruct in the online learning environment.  The syllabus outlines such objectives as learning facilitation and continued response to diverse talents and ways of learning.  The objectives also include continued development of my personal vision as an online instructor.  I will continue to develop the technical skills needed by an online instructor.  Cooperative and collaborative learning strategies are critical to creating and maintain an engaging learning environment of the online learning community.  I also plan to continue the exploration of formative and summative evaluation instruments.
This summer, I will conclude a thirty-three year career which included teaching in a traditional secondary level classroom.  When I began my career computer technology was just being introduced into the classroom.  My technology skills have evolved and with my enrollment in the online teaching and learning program at Governors State, I will continue to keep my knowledge and skill development up to date.  Also, I must practice facilitating asynchronous and synchronous interaction in the online classroom.
First, I am concerned about the learning the process or procedures for developing and maintaining an engaging learning community.  The research reviewed for the first course suggests that developing an engaging learning community motivates students and causes them to think at higher levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy.  There does not seem to be much research demonstrating how this process is accomplished.  I have also asked how can an engaging learning community be supported by using video conferencing and chats.
A second concern is learning about new technology which supports asynchronous and synchronous interactions online.  Hartstinski (2008) defined asynchronous e-learning as email and discussion boards.  Also defined in the article, synchronous e-learning is supported by media such as videoconferencing and chats.  Hartstinski’s research answers the “when”, “why” and how of asynchronous and synchronous e-learning is appropriate.  The research presented correlated the type of communication, benefits and limitations of e-learning.
Facilitating group learning experiences is a third concern.  A review of the research supports the need for “group learning experiences”.  As defined in the Hartstinski article, "learning is participation in the social world", which implies that learning is a dialogue carried out through both internal and social negotiation.  Again, what appears to be absent in the research is the “technique” or “best practices” for facilitation and measuring group learning.  I have a theory that group learning online may be different or at least may present numerous differences than group learning in the traditional classroom.
I believe enrollment and completion of the Facilitation of Online Learning course and interactions with the instructor will support my learning style and answer the questions/concerns that I currently possess.

Facilitating Online Learning – End of Part 1:  My Reflections regarding the first part of this course Changing Roles and Pedagogy (June 10, 2012)
We explored the differences between teaching online and in a face to face environment.  First, the primary advantage of asynchronous online learning environment is that it allows students to participate in high quality learning situations at anytime of the day through a computer connection.  The online learning experience is a high level dynamic interaction between the instructor and all of the students.  The students and instructor are able to research information about a topic and discuss the information in online forums.  The online learning experience is unlike the traditional classroom because the instructor guides or coaches the students.  The traditional learning experience is typically lead by the teacher and students are the receptors of knowledge rather than engaging and creating knowledge.
I now believe that online instructors must be able to engage students through text-based instruction and facilitation skills.  The traditional classroom instructor may rely on lecture and oral discussions.  While this can be accomplished online, the discussion thread approach appears to be more effective and efficient.  As a future online instructor, I will need to constantly work to be clear and concise in my written instructions and conversations with students and other faculty.  As indicated in the article “Online and Offline Facilitation: Different Yet Alike” by Nancy White “Graphics, sound and other multimedia will become a stronger part of online interaction as bandwidth increases and tools improve.”  I believe we are at the “Little Red School House” stage of development in the history of online learning and instruction.  Certainly, when the teachers of the early 1900’s, worked with children they did not envision a learning community like we have in the traditional classroom or the online classroom.  While the early teaching pioneers worked with their students in those little one-room schools the learning experience was certainly intimate and hopefully engaging.  Today, we must encourage our students to engage us and their fellow students in an online written exchange.
I also believe that instructors and students must be technologically proficient.  The instructor must be proficient in the use of the course management system.  My experience in the previous course and in this course has been using the Blackboard system.  Although my skill set was the novice level over time, I have experienced and continue to strengthen my skills As future online instructors we must be able to use word processing tools and develop good research skills.  Searching the internet for engaging materials that appropriate for the courses we teach.  As future online teachers we also need to be able to teach students how to effectively search the internet and how to appropriately use the information they find.
Another area is that of competency or ability to be an effective manager in the online teaching and learning environment.  Time management seems to be a critical skill for the instructor and student.  As online students we experienced in the first course the need to manage our time to meet deadlines, work with others in small groups and complete the readings and discussion threads.
We reviewed materials pertaining to facilitating asynchronous and synchronous online learning environments.  Instructors must engage students in a learning process.  A series of questioning and responding to questions by students drives the learning process.
Using LinkedIn and Google, I established two social media pages.  The first page I developed connects me to hundreds of individuals who are in the education and business world.  The second page contains various interests that I share with other individuals on the internet.  I will continue to monitor and interact with other professionals who are members of Linked-in,
We explored the changing roles that instructors and student face as they more from the traditional to the online classroom.  The focus of courses in higher education must include implementing the seven principles as discussed by Chieckering and Ehrmann (1996).  The first principle included encouraging contact between students and the instructor.  Students should be able to contact their instructor via e-mail or through arranged chat sessions.  A second principle must be the development of cooperation among students through online discussions and working in collaborative groups.  The instructor must utilize active learning technique which includes the development of good discussion questions and development of assignments that encourage problem solving.  Instructors must also provide prompt feedback to students about their assignments and projects.  Students should understand how to manage their time and establish time for completion of assignments by specific dates.  Instructors must communicate high expectations through the syllabus and the rubric for the scoring of assignment.  Finally, instructors must develop readings and assignments which connect to the variety of learning styles exhibited in my courses.

Facilitating Online Learning – End of Part II:  My Reflections regarding the second part of this course Pedagogy Course and Technical Management (July 8, 2012)
My Pedagogical Role:
Recently, I reviewed the Principles of Effective Learning and Teaching which was published online for the learning programs of Queensland State Schools.  My vision/beliefs about my pedagogical role mirror the five principles of effective learning and teaching.  The five interrelated principles promote effective teaching and learning to include; understanding the learner, understanding the learning process, provide for a supportive and challenging environment, establishing worthwhile learning partnership, shaping and responding to a variety of social and cultural contexts.

The Queensland State Schools base the five principles on several assumptions.  First, every person is a learner and that learning is an ongoing and life long process.  Next, people learn within social and cultural contexts, independently and through interaction with others.  What is learned will depend on the way it is learned and with whom it is learned.  Teaching includes identifying ways others learn best and extending the ways they learn creating learning opportunities and evaluating outcomes.

I plan to incorporate the five interrelated principles in my on-ground and online learning environment.  My focus will be the continued development and nurturing of the "community" atmosphere.  The community of learners will include ensuring an opportunity for all students to participate in course discussions and group projects in a safe and secure environment.  I also plan to incorporate the five assumptions.  Students will be encouraged to complete readings and engaging in online or the traditional classroom discussions.

  
Inclusion of Cognitive and Constructivist Teaching Strategies:
There are numerous teaching strategies which I plan to use in my on-ground and online classroom.  Several pedagogy theories were from Lea Chapuis (2003).  First, Bloom's Taxonomy  - cognitive and affective domains include; knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis and evaluative types of discussion questions were reviewed.  The teacher to student and student to student interacting will be used to apply Bloom's Theory to the learning experiences of my courses.  Howard Gardner's Multiple Intelligences of  logical-mathematic, linguistic, spatial, Musical, Bodily Kinesthetic, Personal and Naturalistic will be part of group assignments, which students will complete for the course.    Art Costas - Habits of the Mind are also types of behavior which will be incorporated into my class.

Focusing on the Learning Community and the Role of Increasing Student Retention:
Most of the literature about effective teaching and learning includes a social element.  The interaction of the teacher and students is vital to learning and reinforcing concepts and skills.  Online learning environments provide various ways of connecting the instructor and students.  Hewson and Hughes (2005), promote a learning process which includes the "facilitator tasks and roles" including the tasks students face as they develop their participation in an educationally productive way in an online classroom.  The authors reference Gange's "instructional events" approach (1985) to include five events of instruction.  The five events are; Orientation - Gaining the learner's attention, Presentation - Guiding the learner as the lesson is presented, Practice - providing opportunities for the learner to interest with the lesson other students and providing feedback, Testing - Developing reliable and valid ways on the predetermined learning outcomes, Retention and Transfer - Helping the learner remember and apply information in similar and dissimilar contests (learning transfer)

The research on the characteristics of the online environment support the theory that this learning experience meets the needs of students (Harasim, Hults, Teles and Turoff, 1995).  Like many instructors, I want to encourage deep learning in my courses (Biggs, 1987).  This will be accomplished by engaging students through dialogue.  As Paulsen (1995), points out, the real challenge is in an online learning environment is to achieve absorption in that dialogue.  My role as moderator and facilitator will be to reinforce effective discussions with comments.  I also plan to develop assignments which will ask students to reflect on their readings and discussion in quarterly blog assignments for the course.  The reflective blogs which students complete every four weeks will be designed to reinforce the learning of the students.

 Developing Facilitation Strategies to Enhance the Ongoing Maintenance of Learning Communities:
As mentioned in our readings and discussions, prior to the start of the course several elements need to be present.  The course syllabus will take several months to develop.  Once it is developed some modifications may be necessary depending on the length of the semester,  Next, an orientation section for the course will be added to the course page.  The orientation section will include a welcome statement.  Students will be informed that each time they logg-in or enter the online classroom they will view the announcements for the week and lesson.  A calendar of assignments and due dates will also be posted.  Students will be encouraged to review the course syllabus.  Information such as my GSU email and phone number will be displayed.  A notice of times when I will be available for office hours and conferences will be posted.  Prior to the start of the course, I will check and update links to university resources and all links associated with the course.  A "frequently asked questions" section will be provided to students.  They will also be informed of the communication process for the course.  If students have any questions about the course syllabus, course content, due dates or general question they will be directed to post them to the "Course Question" discussion thread, so that I can respond and the entire class can read the response.  Any questions or issues that a student has personally should be sent to my GSU email for response or conference.

After the course begins students will be provided with expectations of their level of performance.  I will also reinforce the communication process and procedures.  My office hours, phone contact and GSU email information will also be posted again for students to review.  Grading and the evaluation process will be reviewed.  Students will be encouraged to check their grades for discussions, projects and papers each week.  I will continue to review and maintain course links and make changes as needed.  I anticipate that the after course tasks and responding to discussions will take about three or four hours daily early in the semester.
Bibliography

Chapurs, Lea (2003), "Pedagogy", Education & Training - Module 1.0 Pedagogy (Retrieved on June 13, 2012 at http://bb9.govst.edu/bbcwebdav/pid315538-d...Lesson_04/Pedagogy-learning-technologies.pdf)
Gange', R. M. (1985) "The Conditions of Learning (4th Ed.), New York, NY., Holt, Rhinehart & Winston Publishing. (Retrieved on June 6, 2012 at http://www.editlib.org/d/4805/article_4805.pdf)
Chickering, Arthur and Ehrmann, Stephen (1996), "Implementing The Seven Principles: Technology As Lever".  AAHE Bulletin, October, p. 3-6. (Retrieved on May 23, 2012 at http://www.tltgroup.org/programs/seven.html)
Hewson, Lindsay and Hughes, Chris (2005), Social Processes and Pedagogy in Online Learning" and Biggs, J. (1996) "Enhancing Teaching Through Constructive Alignment: Higher Education, 32, p. 1-18, AACE Journal 13(2), p. 99-125. (Retrieved on June 20, 2012 at http://ww.editlib.org/d/4805/article_4805.pdf)
Hrastinski, Stefan; "Asynchronous Synchronous E-Learning:  A Study of Asynchronous and Synchronous E-learning Methods Discovered that Each Support Different Purposes".  Educause Quarterly, No. 4, 2008, p. 51-55. (Retrieved on May 23, 2012 at http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+QUARTERLY...Asynchronous_Synchronous Elea163445)
Principles of Effective Teaching and Learning - Queensland State Schools (Retrieved on June 13, 2012 at http://education.qld.gov.au/curriculum/learning/teaching/technology/principl.html)
Paulsen, M.F. (1995), "The Online Report on Pedagogy Techniques for Computer - Mediated Communications" (Retrieved on July 8, 2012 at http://www.netskolen.com/'forsk)

White, Nancy; "Online and Offline Facilitation:  Different Yet Alike?"  Full Circle Associates 4616 25th Avenue, HE PMB#126 - Seattle, WA 98105. (Retrieved on May 23, 2012 at http://www.fullcirc.com/community/onvsofflinefac.htm)

Saturday, May 5, 2012

Intro to Online Teaching ONTL 650 - Part II


Introduction to Online Teaching – May, 2012: End of Part II – Lessons 7-10 Update

In addition to the concepts and experiences learned in part I of this course, I have also:

·        Reviewed learning theory and how the section of learning theory influences online course design and delivery

·        Looked at online pedagogy and considered what changes in teaching practices an instructor may need to make when moving from a traditional (face-to-face) environment to an online environment

·        Explore the current state of the art instructional technology available for use in web-enhanced, hybrid and fully operating online courses.

·        Explore the technology of online learning and consider the factors and constraints for the delivery of technology needed for an online learning environment.

·        Launched an electronic portfolio to include an overview of the online to teaching and learning reflection, presentation of individual and group work.

Electronic Portfolio:
The first topic reviewed and discussed in lesson 6 and the second half of the semester was the use of an electronic portfolios as a learning and assessment tool.  Although the technology to support the e-portfolio is new, the concept of the portfolio is not.  I submitted and defended a paper portfolio for partial fulfillment of requirements for my Doctorial degree at Loyola University - Chicago.  It is believed that the e-portfolio will impact higher education unlike any other technology.  There seems to be three immerging trends as I researched the electronic portfolio.  First, student work is in electronic form and is easy to send through the internet.  Second, access to the web is virtually everywhere.  Third, databases are available through web sites, which will encourage students to manage and store large volumes of data and access through a dynamic website.  Lastly, because student work is transportable and widely acceptable, the e-portfolio may impact curriculum, faculty evaluations, assessment and validation of student work.

Learning Theory and Online Learning Environment:
The next topic reviewed and discussed included learning theory and the application of the online learning environment.  Early in the first course, we reviewed the literature which pertained to the learning theories of the behaviorist, cognitivist and constructivist.  The literature supporting learning theory continues to grow at a rapid rate.  Additionally, as technology continues to evolve, online learning will also increase.  Through our readings we discovered the many benefits associated  with online learning.

We discovered that the online learning technology is a good vehicle for all three learning theories.  The benefits of online learning for me included my ability to deliver instruction at anytime and in any place which had access to the internet.  My students and I will benefit from an asynchronous learning environment.  Learning will begin when students are ready and at any location with an internet connection and computer.  Curriculum and materials that can be updated to include the latest research because the printed textbook reflects research which is nearly two years old when it published.  I will be able to direct students to preselected research materials and readings and will require that each of them add to the foundation which I provided.
Online learning enhances the behaviorist model because the response to a stimulus can be observed immediately, even in the absence of the instructor.  As an instructor, I can apply the congnitivist model to online learning.  I can develop strategies that allow learners to transfer their knowledge of the materials from their senses (sight and hearing) to their sensory store and then to their working memory.  I plan to create lessons which will include internal processing, thinking, reflection, abstraction, self-motivation and cognition.  This learning experience, will evolve through "thought provoking" questions that will include real-life case studies.  Students will be asked to provide solutions to modern day teaching and learning problems and discuss/defend them in online discussions with other student members.

 Although online learning seems to be relatively new, Wilson (1997), the research shows three functions of good educational theory which applies to the online learning environment.  As suggested in the research, "Theory" helps to envision how education can best take advantage of enhanced communication, information retrieval and management capability provided by the internet.  Second, theory helps to choose resources as needed to maximize efficiency of our curriculum delivery.  Good theory helps to develop the "big picture" in a time when resources are scare.  Third theory helps to build upon what is known and plans for additional action.
An example of theory application is the online learning model found in Chapter 2 - Toward a Theory of Online Learning by Anderson (2004).  The model considers the interactions of student-content, student-instructor and student-student.  The model also considers the concept of asynchronous and synchronous communication strategies.  Instructional and assessment approaches and other key variable are considered.  It was interesting that this model is not part of any systematic research.  It appears there are many opportunities for research in the field of online pedagogy.  The completion of systematic research of the online learning model could result in potential improvements in the professional practice of higher education.

Online Pedagogy and Research:
The reading for this lesson focused on the introduction and application of the Seven Principles for Good Undergraduate Education.  Chickering and Gamson (1987) presented the seven principles with examples of each principle.  The American Association of Higher Education and Education Commission of the States and the Johnson Foundation presented an implementation study of the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education.  The seven principles promote good practice to encourage the following; 1) Student-Faculty Contact, 2) Cooperation Among Students, 3) Active Learning, 4) Giving Prompt Feedback, 5) Emphasizes Time on Task, 6) High Expectations, 7) Respects Diverse Talents and Ways of Learning.

 Rubric Development and Annotated Bibliography:
During the last three weeks of this first course we reviewed the literature pertaining to rubrics and development of an annotated bibliography.  As a member and team captain, I participated in the development of a rubric using the Wet Paint Wiki Tool.  Our rubric was designed to identify exemplary websites which we could use in future course that we might teach.  Using the wet paint tool we developed our rubric and assembled our annotated bibliography of exemplary websites as defined in our rubric.  I believe the wiki collaboration tool was more effective than our prior experience with the e-mail tool.

My Electronic Portfolio Submission:
The assignment included the development of an electronic portfolio.  My portfolio represents selected work from this first course.  After reviewing the lesson materials and instructions, the process for creating my e-portfolio was relatively simple.  My newly launched electronic portfolio can be viewed at http://drdavecorbin.wetpaint.com/

The following items are a demonstration of achieved learning objectives for part II:
Posted this professional blog-"My Thought of Online Learning" and Intro to Online Teaching - Part I & II

Launched version 1 of my e-portfolio at http://drdavecorbin.wetpaint.com/
Participated in over 100 online discussions with students enrolled in the ONTL 650 course.

Participated in a group project to produce the online unit - Civil Rights Movement 1954 - 1964.  Please view this project at http://attachments.wetpaintser.us/OFE_EMShtbFoVpOcMZtGvg19600744
Participated in second group project to produce a rubric and annotated bibliography of exemplary instructional websites using a wet paint collaboration tool.  This can be viewed at http://group3ontl605.wetpaint.com/page/introduction



Bibliography
Ally, Mohamed (2004) Chpater 1 - "Foundations of Educational Theory for Online Learning", Theory and Practice of Online Learning - digital textbook.  Retrieved on May 4, 2012 from: http://cde.athabascau.ca/online_book/ch.1html
Anderson, Terry (2004) Chapter 2 - Toward a Theory of Online Learning - digital textbook.  Retrieved on May 4, 2012 from http://cde.athabascau.ca/online_book/ch2.html

Chickering, Arthur and Gamson, Zalda. (1987), "Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education".  The Wingspread Journal, Vol. 9, No. 2. Published by the Johnson Foundation P.O. Box 547, Racine, WI
Felder, R. M. (2010). Learning Styles and Strategies. Retrieved February 5, 2012, from NCSU Felder: http://www4.ncsu.edu/felder-public/ILSdir/styles.htm

Grasha, R. (2010). Grasha 5-Teaching Styles Inventory, accessed online. Retrieved February 26, 2012, from Grasha 5-Teaching Styles Inventory from http://fcrc.indstate.edu/tstyles3.html
Hrastinski, Stefan, "Asynchrononus, Synchronous Elearning;  A study of asynchronous and synchronous elearning methods discovered that each supports different purposes"  Educause Quarterly, Number 4, 2008, p. 51-55

McMahon, J. a. (2000). "High touch and hig tech". ALN National Conferences, University of Maryland . University College. Sloan-C View. Retriefed February 2, 2012 from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/view/v2n7/hightouch.htm
Schmidt, K. (2010). A Model to Integrate Online Teaching and Learning Tools into the Classroom. The Journal of Technology Studies , 86-91. Retrieved February 21, 2012 from http://www.scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JOTS/v30/v30n2/pdf/schmidt.pdf

Twigg, C. A. (2003, September/October). "Improving Learning and Reducing Costs: New Models for Online Learning:. Retrieved February 21, 2012, from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/PDF/ERMo352.pdf
Wilson, B. (1997) "Thoughts on Theory in Educational Technology." Educational Technology, 37, (10) p. 22-26

Wingard, R. G. (2004) "Classroom Teaching Changes in Web-Enhanced Courses: A Multi-Instructional Study", Educourse Quarterly, 26-30